ABSTRACT
Behavioral medicine researchers have rapidly adapted study procedures and interventions to telehealth modalities during the pandemic. We rely heavily on telehealth research methods to avoid study delays and mitigate risk to chronically ill patients our studies aim to support. We implemented methods to virtually recruit, enroll, and retain patients and their families on clinical trials, and virtually deliver study interventions. These adaptations are likely to become permanent amid ongoing virus variants and surges in cases. However, little has been written about how remote methods apply in practice. This paper documents these processes to maximize efficiency across our research studies and systems and highlights the strengths and challenges of transitioning our research protocols to telehealth. We outline solutions to using remote methods across the entire span of the research process, including study recruitment, data collection, and intervention delivery. We offer insight into the implications of these transitions on research staff and interventionists. In providing a transparent review of the advantages and challenges of implementing remote methods, we encourage discourse around remote methods implementation, share the lessons we learned, and inform the design of future trials. Further research is needed to review the clinical feasibility and acceptability of these procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis was very rare prior to the current pandemic. A sharp rise in cases has been observed from March to August of 2022 in Los Angeles. Such an increase, especially with certain types of antibodies, may point toward the possibility of post-infectious autoimmune encephalitis. While review articles on autoimmune encephalitis during this pandemic have been published, a sharp rise in one geographic area within a short period of time has not been documented yet. AIMS: To report an alarming increase in autoimmune encephalitis with mostly positive glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and/or voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) antibodies over six months during 2022 in Downtown Los Angeles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an observational case series from one neurocritical care practice in Downtown Los Angeles. Autoimmune encephalitis antibody panels were sent to patients with altered mental status or neurologic deficits of unclear etiology from March to August of 2022. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients tested, 12 reports came back positive. Ten had positive GAD and/or VGKC antibodies, one had a positive myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody, and one had a positive leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 protein antibody; a 41% positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: This observation has important implications: (1) We may be entering an era of heightened autoimmune encephalitis. (2) These occurrences may be post-infectious in nature at this point of the pandemic. (3) Mostly GAD and VGKC antibodies have been identified (10 of them), which may point toward a new direction of research from a molecular mimicry standpoint. (4) To benefit patients, clinicians need to be aware of such disease manifestations and increase testing; resources must be increased to improve test availability and shorten turnaround time; and treatment, which is expansive, must be made widely available for these potentially reversible diseases.
ABSTRACT
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody has been associated with a wide range of neurological diseases, from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder to acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. However, MOG positivity with isolated encephalitis has been infrequently reported. MRI findings are usually of the demyelination type. In this case, we report on a patient with COVID-19 exposure who presented with altered mental status and multiple ring-enhancing lesions on MRI mimicking metastatic disease. Due to his unusual MRI findings and presentation, the correct diagnosis was not apparent until MOG antibody results came back positive.